AMERICAN FOUNDATION CRITIQUED
AMERICAN FOUNDATION CRITIQUED
I am sure that I’m running the risk of really upsetting the American patriots who see the “American Way” as the epitome of infallible logic and justice. If you are one of those whom I have just described, you should probably move onto another blog, for what I am about to say will likely wreak havoc with your deeply entrenched belief system. Not that my purpose is to inflame, but I do hope to bestir an attitude of deep reflection in those who are willing to hear me out with an open mind. Often I have thought about how arbitrarily the foundations of the American system have been established, but until now, I have not voiced my opinion—at least not my full argument. The underlying principle of a democratic system of government is that the citizens of a given nation should have a say in the leaders who preside over that nation. It is also generally believed that all citizens who are eligible to vote should vote. Indeed, voting is considered a duty that every responsible citizen should undertake. These beliefs are underpinnings of the American philosophy of government, and I have no real beef with them, other than I believe the criteria for voting should be based upon ones understanding of the issues and candidates, as well as on ones contributions to society, rather than on age and the number of years that one has resided within this country. The very idea that the leaders of this country, as well as the citizens who support them, have come to the conclusion that an intelligent boy, say of 15 years old, who is well-informed of the issues and of the candidates’ positions on those issues cannot voice an opinion in that election is preposterous in my eyes. It seems even more absurd when one considers that there are multitudes of people who are of “legal voting age” who know little or nothing about what is at stake, and yet go out to vote simply because they feel it is their sacred duty. Similarly, when it comes to immigrants, the American system does not allow them the right to participate in government decisions until they have lived here for some arbitrarily determined number of years—I believe seven. This hardly seems fair to me, since I know many immigrants to our country who are extremely knowledgeable about key political issues and who have made significant contributions to the country’s welfare, despite not having lived here for a long period of time. On the other hand, I will venture to say that far too many natural born Americans go to the polls who spend a large majority of their time in a drunken or drug-induced stupor and believe they are good, loyal Americans simply because they make it a habit to vote at elections. In essence, the foundation of the American government allows for the possibility that our leaders could be elected at the hands of totally ignorant and lazy individuals. Now how can this problem be averted? Well, how about screening people—not by some stupid criteria like minimum age or minimum time spent living in this country—but by their level of competence? Is this not a brilliant idea? Yeh, yeh, I know, many of you are thinking what a high-brow I’m being, but come on, be serious here. If you are a business owner and you want your business to run as smoothly as possible, you are obviously going to seek out the best-qualified employees. Likewise, our nation should be built and run by people who possess at least a minimum of awareness of their responsibilities and who have proven that they have an ability and willingness to contribute. Am I suggesting that every eligible voter should hold a BA or PhD in political science or some related discipline? Certainly not, but I am suggesting that the arbitrary criteria that are now in place be dropped in favor of criteria that require at least some degree of competence. If voting is truly such a great responsibility, then we surely do not want this responsibility placed in the hands of total fools; certainly, we want to do our utmost to relinquish even the possibility of such a catastrophe. That is just common sense in my opinion (or if it is not common sense, I hope it becomes so!) See you at the polls!
I am sure that I’m running the risk of really upsetting the American patriots who see the “American Way” as the epitome of infallible logic and justice. If you are one of those whom I have just described, you should probably move onto another blog, for what I am about to say will likely wreak havoc with your deeply entrenched belief system. Not that my purpose is to inflame, but I do hope to bestir an attitude of deep reflection in those who are willing to hear me out with an open mind. Often I have thought about how arbitrarily the foundations of the American system have been established, but until now, I have not voiced my opinion—at least not my full argument. The underlying principle of a democratic system of government is that the citizens of a given nation should have a say in the leaders who preside over that nation. It is also generally believed that all citizens who are eligible to vote should vote. Indeed, voting is considered a duty that every responsible citizen should undertake. These beliefs are underpinnings of the American philosophy of government, and I have no real beef with them, other than I believe the criteria for voting should be based upon ones understanding of the issues and candidates, as well as on ones contributions to society, rather than on age and the number of years that one has resided within this country. The very idea that the leaders of this country, as well as the citizens who support them, have come to the conclusion that an intelligent boy, say of 15 years old, who is well-informed of the issues and of the candidates’ positions on those issues cannot voice an opinion in that election is preposterous in my eyes. It seems even more absurd when one considers that there are multitudes of people who are of “legal voting age” who know little or nothing about what is at stake, and yet go out to vote simply because they feel it is their sacred duty. Similarly, when it comes to immigrants, the American system does not allow them the right to participate in government decisions until they have lived here for some arbitrarily determined number of years—I believe seven. This hardly seems fair to me, since I know many immigrants to our country who are extremely knowledgeable about key political issues and who have made significant contributions to the country’s welfare, despite not having lived here for a long period of time. On the other hand, I will venture to say that far too many natural born Americans go to the polls who spend a large majority of their time in a drunken or drug-induced stupor and believe they are good, loyal Americans simply because they make it a habit to vote at elections. In essence, the foundation of the American government allows for the possibility that our leaders could be elected at the hands of totally ignorant and lazy individuals. Now how can this problem be averted? Well, how about screening people—not by some stupid criteria like minimum age or minimum time spent living in this country—but by their level of competence? Is this not a brilliant idea? Yeh, yeh, I know, many of you are thinking what a high-brow I’m being, but come on, be serious here. If you are a business owner and you want your business to run as smoothly as possible, you are obviously going to seek out the best-qualified employees. Likewise, our nation should be built and run by people who possess at least a minimum of awareness of their responsibilities and who have proven that they have an ability and willingness to contribute. Am I suggesting that every eligible voter should hold a BA or PhD in political science or some related discipline? Certainly not, but I am suggesting that the arbitrary criteria that are now in place be dropped in favor of criteria that require at least some degree of competence. If voting is truly such a great responsibility, then we surely do not want this responsibility placed in the hands of total fools; certainly, we want to do our utmost to relinquish even the possibility of such a catastrophe. That is just common sense in my opinion (or if it is not common sense, I hope it becomes so!) See you at the polls!